Voting for a presidential candidate is not unlike buying a car
Reject the sales pitch and get what you need.
You need a car. You’re going to go car shopping.
The first dealership you stop at has a bunch of cars but each one has a bad engine and cosmetic defects. The second dealership you stop at similarly has a bunch of cars and each with a bad engine. You ask the second dealership why you should buy one of their cars, and they point out their vehicles have fewer cosmetic defects than the other dealership you visited. That is certainly true. Frustrated you find yourself at yet another dealership. This one actually has working cars. Unfortunately, they don’t accept money. It’s not clear business. You don’t have to spend a dollar, but you can only enter a free sweepstakes for a real car with a working engine.
What do you do?
If your issue is stopping genocide or even any other issue in the myriad of issues that the parties fail to distinguish themselves on, this is the American presidential election. There isn’t an anti-genocide candidate. And that’s the issue without which I can not endorse. A candidate who is genocidal is not a candidate I’m interested in, in the same way a car without an engine is not a car I’m interested in.
That’s why I vote for the Green Party. It’s a sweepstakes, but better. Because unlike a sweepstakes the more people that play, the more likely you are to win.
If you happen to think that being anti-genocide isn’t as fundamental a qualification as an engine is to a car then I leave you with this question to convince me otherwise,
Name one thing that Trump has done that was worse than continuing to enable the same genocide in Gaza that Biden enabled.